Callum Gafford is yet another summer born child who faces losing a year of his education as penalty for starting school at CSAge, and his mother Natalie was interviewed by reporter Sean Killick on BBC South Today (02:58-07:59)
During today’s report, member of the Education Select Committee Caroline Nokes said, “I absolutely think that the decision should rest with the parents who do know their children best and that this has to be a decision in the interests of every child not for administrative neatness for a local authority.”
This was followed by a pre-recorded interview with Schools Minister Nick Gibb, who began by talking about the ‘parents calling for greater rights because of conditions imposed by councils‘ when they request Reception class entry at CSAge:
“When they do that, they are very often told by local authorities that they have to miss the Reception class and go straight into year one when they do start, which means they’ve missed a whole year of teaching and those essential skills of reading and early arithmetic and that is a problem that many parents have brought to my attention.”
(Presenter Laura Trant) What do you want to see happen?
“Well, I’m concerned about children missing that Reception class, so I’ve asked our department to review the case for giving parents greater rights about when their child will start formal school if they decide to delay the entry for their child in formal education.
So for example if they did decide not to start school when they’re four and they want to wait until the child has actually turned five, then whether or not the parent should be given the right to start that education in the reception class rather than year one, and I’m sympathetic to that view because I don’t want to see any child, regardless of when they are born, missing out on that essential early teaching of reading and arithmetic that takes place in the Reception class.”
(Presenter Laura Trant) Of course and as the MP for Bognor Regis and Littlehampton you must be particularly aware of what campaigners are saying in West Sussex, where they explain it is especially difficult to get delayed entry there, and that is because of how West Sussex interprets the guidelines. So what’s going to happen?
“Yes, West Sussex is not the only authority that is reluctant to allow children to be taught outside their normal age group and it’s that flexibility that we want to see introduced into the education system and that might mean changing the admissions code, it might mean changing the law; that’s what I’ve asked officials in the department for education to review, and once I’ve seen the results of that review then we’ll take a decision about how prescriptive and what regulations need to be changed.”
West Sussex County Council
Meanwhile, Callum and his parents face an uncertain future, and are even trying to apply for school places in neighbouring Hampshire where the council’s position is far more flexible (until the new 2014 Code at least, when head teacher’s views became a critical element of its decision making; now more parents there are facing battles too).
And just so that readers can have a better idea of the challenges parents face when they make their summer born requests to admission authorities, here’s what Natalie was advised in an October 2014 from West Sussex County Council’s Pupil Admissions Manager (note that the DfE confirmed that a blanket policy of Year 1 entry for CSAge summer born children was unlawful even under the 2012 Code):
“Your application for Backclassing should be accompanied by evidence from professionals as to why it is considered necessary for Callum to start school in reception in 2016…
A Summer born child legally does not have to start school until the following September , however if a parent chooses to do this it would be for year 1.
I strongly advise to you to apply for a place in September 2015 ,as if backclassing is refused the school of your preference may well be oversubscribed.
I will send you the backclassing information by post as well.”
Author and Journalist
With thanks to Rosie Dutton for transcribing the BBC South Today interviews.
Unbelievable! What on earth is so ‘backthinking’ of these organisations that makes this very reasonable, evidence based and fair request so difficult for them??? Its un just to behave in this way. It’s time they evolved to provide fair and equal access to education for all children not just the select group that fit in with their spreadsheets!! I am constantly amazed that we are in this situation in 2015! It’s a no brainer, the current system intrinsically disadvantages summerborns full stop. That is wrong, and has to stop. The individuals writing these responses to good and caring parents have a moral obligation to address this and not blindly follow processes ignoring individual children’s needs. This lack of individuals taking accountability for their own actions within a systems had produced discrimination & disadvantage throughout history (to say the least) Should educated individuals not have evolved past this by now? It’s time systems were challenged by those implementing them as well as having to be told by government, when it is clear they are causeing harm. Individual responsibility, moral obligation, evolution! Whatever it’s time it got put right. I have high hopes Nick Gibb can finally dirt out this ridiculous and pointlessly discriminatory situation .
The minister needs to remember that it is not just the reception year that children are forced to miss.
In my sons case we were granted a reception class place at CSA only to have a new head teacher revoke it a year later and for my son to jump from reception to year 2 without ever accessing the year 1 curriculum. I know this has happened to many children, when they change school or move area they are forced to rejoin their “birth cohort” no matter what damage this transition may do to their education and emotional well being. All of these loopholes need to be legislated against, not just the initial admissions decision one.
Pingback: Prematurity Is Not The (only) Point – Legislation Covers All Summer Born Children | summerbornchildren
It has always been my intention to start my #summerborn at CSA and “fight” for a reception start. I’ve backed down at points where it looks like the battle will be too great when hearing of other parents with still unresolved cases after 12-18 months of first applying. I’ve also questioned my intentions if indeed she has to miss a year later down the line; weighing up a later start and better foundations against the big leap later when she is much older and more aware of what she’s being forced to do.
Asking for a reception place at CSA, a legal definition, should be as easy a process as asking for a reception place a year early at 4!
I’m glad that the hard work of the campaign is paying off and we are finally on the way to getting the amendments to make the system much fairer!
I just cannot understand some (many) admissions authorities’ reluctance to give Summer born children what they should be entitled to – automatic access to Reception class at CSAge if this is in line with their parents’ wishes. These admission authorities waste huge amounts of time and money arguing with parents when there is absolutely no justification for forcing children to miss a whole year of schooling and It is certainly never in the child’s best interests to do so. I welcome the news that Nick Gibb has decided to amend the code so that parents decide which year their child starts in at CSAge but I am still concerned as admissions authorities are getting away with ignoring the current code – how will he and the Department of Education ensure that admissions authorities will comply with the new code?
Pingback: DfE Stalls on Summer Born Admissions Again | summerbornchildren
Pingback: LGO Publishes Guidance on Summer Born Admissions | summerbornchildren