Chaos on Jan.15 Deadline Day as Parents Scramble to Apply for 2015 Places They Don’t Actually Want

monopoly chance cardThe Summer Born Campaign Facebook Group has seen a flurry of desperate and anxious posts in recent days and weeks as the primary school admissions application deadline approached.

There’s much confusion, anger and frustration as PARENTS OF 3-YEAR OLD CHILDREN ARE FORCED TO APPLY for a September 2015 place that they have explicitly told school and council admissions authorities THEY DON’T WANT.

Incredibly, this is in the same week the BBC has quoted the LGO as saying councils are “pulling out all the stops to ensure there is a place for every child“.

Why is this happening? Continue reading

Posted in CAMPAIGN UPDATES | Leave a comment

Second Summer Born Report Looks Inevitable as Compulsory School ‘Age 4’ Start Continues

100_2276We genuinely thought primary legislation would count for something – and ironically the Code actually says it should.

But the Department for Education’s failure to make necessary amendments to its 2014 School Admissions Code, to ensure that a summer born child can, by default, enter Reception class AT compulsory school age – and remain within that year group for the whole of their education – has only exacerbated an already unfair and inequitable admissions system, and further sanctioned the postcode lottery that exists.

And as the admission application deadline is reached today, we are already aware of numerous cases of highly questionable and possibly unlawful practices.  Many admissions authorities are insisting that parents provide ‘exceptional reasons’ and ‘documentary evidence from professionals’ to support their request for a compulsory school age start,

Continue reading

Posted in CAMPAIGN UPDATES | 1 Comment

The Times: Parents lose right to decide summer child’s school start

pre-school allianceThe headline says it all – compulsory school age LEGISLATIVE RIGHTS have in practice been eroded, just as our January 2014 Summer Born report exposed.

And as Neil Leitch, chief executive of the Pre-school Learning Alliance, and one of this campaign’s supporters, points out, “under the new guidance, admission authorities still have the right to completely disregard parents’ wishes — and worse still, parents do not have a right to appeal. This is clearly grossly unfair, and we would urge the government to reconsider its approach on this matter.

Education Editor Greg Hurst’s December 19 report, “Parents lose right to decide summer child’s school start” also included Continue reading

Posted in MEDIA COVERAGE | 2 Comments

Christmas Code Continues to Cause Controversy

IMG_9491Santa’s SAC (School Admissions Code) delivers a big disappointment to summer born children today.

The government’s ‘explanatory note‘, says it “clarifies the provisions relating to the admission of summer born children who wish to delay entry into reception” but our press release and recent comments submitted to the Education Committee explain why these “provisions” are entirely unpredictable and undependable:

Confusion and Complaints will Continue – as new 2014 Code maintains Postcode Lottery for Summer Born Admissions“.

Ironically, the Statutory Instrument published a few days ago has David Laws Continue reading

Posted in CAMPAIGN UPDATES | 1 Comment

Summer Born Campaign group submits Evidence to the Education Committee

c artwork for cufflink april 2011-1In response to the Education Committee’s invitation for views on the strength of evidence for the DfE’s policy on summer born children, the Summer Born Campaign has submitted the evidence below in response to the DfE’s ‘Evidence Check’ memorandum:

1. Important relevant research papers not referred to in the DfE’s evidence:
https://summerbornchildren.org/2014/12/15/important-research-papers-for-the-education-committees-evidence-check/ Continue reading

Posted in EDUCATION COMMITTEE EVIDENCE | Leave a comment

Important Research Papers for the Education Committee’s ‘Evidence Check’

c artwork for cufflink april 2011-1Below a list of additional evidence submitted to the Education Committee following their invitation for views on the strength of the evidence in relation to the current policy on Summer Born Children and the effect of birth date on student achievement (my bold).

(Pottegård 2014) Children’s relative age in class and use of medication for ADHD: a Danish Nationwide Study.
Lack of relative age effect found “may be due to the high proportion (40%) of relatively young children held back by 1 year in the Danish school system”. Continue reading

Posted in EDUCATION COMMITTEE EVIDENCE | 1 Comment

Response to the DfE’s ‘Summer Born Children’ Evidence Check for the Education Committee

IMG_6841The DfE’s ‘Evidence Check’ memorandum can be read here, and the numbers in our response below relate to this.

POLICY
1. Re: “the point at which the other children in their year group are moving up from the reception class to year one“.
Summer born (SB) children prior to CSAge don’t yet ‘belong’ to any year group. They haven’t started school yet. Continue reading

Posted in EDUCATION COMMITTEE EVIDENCE | 3 Comments

Education Committee ‘Summer Born’ Comments by Michelle Melson

100_2260Michelle Melson has also submitted the comments below to the Education Committee’s ‘Evidence check’ forum on Summer Born Children:

PART 1 –… the point at which the other children in their year group are moving up from the reception class to year one.” Let’s not forget that those summer born children that are moving up to Year 1 at this point started school EARLY, prior to CSA. Summer born children starting school in Reception class at CSA sit perfectly within the legal meanings of reception class and relevant age group. Continue reading

Posted in EDUCATION COMMITTEE EVIDENCE | Leave a comment

Education Committee ‘School Starting Age’ Comments by Michelle Melson

charlie and lolaOne of the authors of the January 2014 Summer Born report, Michelle Melson, has submitted these comments to the Education Committee’s ‘Evidence check’ forum on School Starting Age:

PART 1 – DfE paragraph 2 “Parents who feel their child is not ready to start school before the compulsory school age”. Has the DfE even considered the fact that some parents just do not want their children to start school prior to Compulsory School Age and that they will not be starting school prior to this irrespective of ‘school readiness’? Continue reading

Posted in EDUCATION COMMITTEE EVIDENCE | Leave a comment

Education Committee ‘Phonics’ Comments by Pauline Hull

IMG_6287For me, both as a parent and former teacher, one of the worse aspects of intense and excessive phonics teaching over a period of two years is that it can have an adverse effect on children who are actually progressing very well, even confidently, in their reading and writing – to the point that they hate their phonics sessions at school and feel extremely frustrated when the rules they are learning don’t apply to the more advanced vocabulary that they’re reading in books outside of school. Continue reading

Posted in EDUCATION COMMITTEE EVIDENCE | 1 Comment

Education Committee ‘Summer Born’ Comments by Pauline Hull

100_2260I have also submitted the comments below to the Education Committee’s ‘Evidence check’ forum on Summer Born Children:

PART 1 – The main point with regards the DfE’s strength of evidence is this – it’s most relevant to the wrong questions, and much of the research was carried out by people who believed compulsory school age (CSAge) to be earlier than it actually is. The evidence focuses on ‘whether’ summer born (SB) children should or need to start school AT compulsory school age (or to ‘delay’ entry as it is colloquially termed), and whether this might reduce ‘relative age effects’. But the question really is this: Continue reading

Posted in EDUCATION COMMITTEE EVIDENCE | 1 Comment

Education Committee ‘School Starting Age’ Comments by Pauline Hull

charlie and lolaOne of the authors of the January 2014 Summer Born report, Pauline Hull, has submitted these comments to the Education Committee’s ‘Evidence check’ forum on School Starting Age:

PART 1 – Principally the Committee should be concerned that in its evidence on SSA, the DfE has itself incorrectly cited compulsory school age (CSAge) twice. This is a huge red flag. Continue reading

Posted in EDUCATION COMMITTEE EVIDENCE | Leave a comment

BBC South Coverage of Summer Born Postcode Lottery

Sam and Holly Dec 2014On Thursday 4th December, this BBC News report highlighted the inconsistency between different admissions authorities in how they interpret the School Admissions Code in relation to summer born children starting school at compulsory school age – ironically referred to as “delayed entry” just because these children are ‘expected‘ to start school at age 4 (one year early) and this has long been considered ‘the norm‘.

In a follow up to her September 2, 2013 report, BBC South producer and reporter Chrissy Sturt spoke with parents from our SB Campaign including Sam and Holly Watts, who are having to fight for the right to simply exercise their legal parental duty in West Sussex:    “If we were living 13 miles to the west across the border, it’d be almost guaranteed for our son to start in Reception in 2016, and bearing in mind that those counties are applying the same guidelines, the same Admissions Code, …how can you have such a subjective interpretation?

And incredibly, the council’s statement to the BBC demonstrates just how much power local authorities are trying to wield when it comes to enforcing an age 4 start: “The responsibility for decisions over deferring pupil start dates rests with each individual authority….

NO – this is not true. It is for us, the parents, to decide Continue reading

Posted in MEDIA COVERAGE | Leave a comment

Research Doctor’s Criticises DfE in Submission to the Education Committee

david ockwell picDr. David Ockwell very kindly contacted the Summer Born Campaign group and gave us permission to publish his submission:

I am a Senior Lecturer at the University of Sussex and Deputy Director of Research at a £10m Economic and Social Research Council funded research centre. In my professional opinion the presentation of the evidence within the DfE “evidence check” memo on summer borne children is misleading.

My independent review of the evidence on summer borne children (in my position as a professional researcher specialising in evidence based policy advice) suggests the following:  Continue reading

Posted in EDUCATION COMMITTEE EVIDENCE | 1 Comment

LibDem MP Formally Objects to School Admissions Code

Annette Brooke MPAnnette Brooke MP has submitted a formal motion objecting to the revised School Admissions Code (The Code is issued under S 84(3) of the School Standards and Framework Act 1998, as amended), praying:

That the draft School Admission Code, which was laid before this House on 30 October 2014, be not made.

Early Day Motion 577 SCHOOL STANDARDS AND FRAMEWORK

We need as many other MPs to sign EDM577 as possible; otherwise the revised Code will automatically become law on December 19, 2014.

Posted in MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT | 1 Comment

OSA Comments on 2014 Draft Code Confirm Confusion and Chaos Ahead

question marksThe Office of the School Adjudicator’s (OSA) response to the DfE’s draft revised Schools Admission Code is the latest document to demonstrate just how UNCLEAR the CODE really is.

Responses from different local authorities, members of the public, and now the OSA, all prove that the proposed 2014 Code (just like the 2012 Code) is neither “clear, fair nor objective” for summer born admissions, with the OSA’s interpretation directly contradicting views expressed by the Department for Education and existing admissions legislation:

7. 5. Proposals relating to summer born children – The proposed text should help to clarify the position for parents. There may be a danger that being educated out of the relevant age group is thought of as an option rather than as an exceptional provision. It may be prudent to include wording that strengthens the position that it is an exception for children to be admitted outside their normal age group.”

The DfE has repeatedly stated, “there does not need to be any exceptional reason or special need for a summer-born child to enter reception rather than Y1 at compulsory school age”, but instead of Continue reading

Posted in CAMPAIGN UPDATES | 2 Comments

Should teachers boycott baseline tests for four-year-olds?

100_2260That is the question being posed in a new online poll on the Day Nurseries website.

Arguing “Yes” is Dr Richard House, Co-founder of Early Childhood Action, education campaigner, trained Steiner Kindergarten and class teacher.

And arguing “No” is David Laws, Minister of State for Schools and the Cabinet Office (the same Minister who, when answering questions regarding summer born admissions problems in March, promised that his department “will take action if we find that schools are not paying attention to parental demand). Continue reading

Posted in MEDIA COVERAGE | 1 Comment

FOI by Summer Born Campaign group reveals Local Authority Disagreement, Confusion & Postcode Lottery

c artwork for cufflink april 2011In response to a Freedom of Information request (Nov.6) by a member of the Summer Born Campaign group, Gemma Adams received (Nov.27) a copy of local authority and public responses to the DfE’s consultation of proposed changes to its School Admissions Code (closed Sep.29).

Even the briefest glance at all these responses makes the inconsistency, confusion, subjectivity and postcode lottery for summer born admissions abundantly clear, as evidenced in the extracts quoted below (or click on the documents):

[ LOCAL AUTHORITY RESPONSES ]*
[ PUBLIC RESPONSES ]

It’s interesting just how many local authorities simply dismiss the fact that compulsory school age is what it is – i.e. the term following a child’s 5th birthday – and while there are a number of valid points raised about when applications should be made and how many, the pressure on parents to apply for and enrol their children in school at age 4 is very clear.

Disagreement is rife in terms of policy, principle, procedures and the role of parents: Continue reading

Posted in CAMPAIGN UPDATES | 13 Comments

When You’re Born Matters But now WHERE YOU LIVE Matters More

IMG_2872The challenges faced by many children born in the summer months is well documented, but since the Department for Education published its updated advice on the school admissions process for summer born children, and a new draft Code, the biggest influential factor and newest life lottery for our children’s education is now WHERE THEY LIVE.

From the mounting evidence of more than 1600 members of the Facebook Group ‘Flexible School Admissions for Summer Borns’, the admissions process for summer born children across England can best be described as inconsistent and unpredictable, both in state and private schools. Continue reading

Posted in CAMPAIGN UPDATES | 1 Comment

Illogical Policy: No Warnings, Fines or Imprisonment for us – our Summer Born children ‘MUST’ miss a Year of Education

monopoly chance cardThe irony is breath taking.

While other parents are being arrested and jailed for allowing their children to miss school,  summer born children are being forced to skip a whole year of their education, against their parents’ wishes (not to mention the child’s best interests).

Just this summer, an Australian study concluded that there is “No safe level of missing school“: “A 10 day period of unauthorised absence in a year is sufficient to drop a child about a band in the NAPLAN testing.

Similarly, this is what 7 English LEAs and teachers had to say about the impact of school absence in a 2003 research report from the University of Glasgow: Continue reading

Posted in CAMPAIGN UPDATES | 8 Comments